On 01/22/2013 02:33 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
If you're going to stack up the exposure on searchers, there ought to be at least as much liability on registrants that fake the search responses.
To quote from my previous note:
There are already a mountain of accuracy obligations imposed by ICANN onto registrants - with the penalty being loss of a domain name, not to mention the UDRP and rapid takedown, or the "don't be bad' provisions in most registrar agreements - there is no need to add more.
No need to add any more. By-the-way, I find the commercial/non-commercial dichotomy to be somewhat blurry. Here's why: A lot of names are used for both personal and business use, particularly very small business use. I believe that even google.com started out as a non-commercial use of a name. --karl--