I had no time since the meeting ended last week in Kenya. First of all, I guess the way we address emails shall be under our rules of politeness. I have no interest in any registry or registar and during 10 years I have been in ICANN working for the interest of the community. So, I do believe, and any one which is not just an academic or a public servant knows very well that particularities of contracts are always debated in privacy. The problem is the name people was using to call these Registrar meetings - It is not a regional meeting at all!! Last November had one of Registrar meetings here in Sao Paulo and only registrars were invited - the agenda: finance details of contracts. Everybody was able to criticize the registrar agreement posted for public consultation. The final platform of any registrar contract is known. The details of each registrar, the problems they are having or not, these are private matter and always will be. I guess we spend so much time talking about no relevant issues and less time working with the policy ones, we should be done. Best to all Vanda Scartezini NEXTi_v1.jpg an ICANN ALS tel: + 55 11 3266.6253 mob:+ 55 11 8181.1464 www.executivasdeti.blogspot.com -----Original Message----- From: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of carlos aguirre Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 9:36 AM To: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] ICANN regional meetings to remain closed Dear Jorge. Right. The ALAC board liaison, could give to us some response at this matter as you said. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre abogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar http://ar.ageiadensi.org
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:14:32 -0600
From: jmamodio@gmail.com
To: at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [At-Large] ICANN regional meetings to remain closed
With all due respect, if that's your understanding and position, I'm
now extremely concerned that you have been selected to be ALAC's
liaison to the board.
What kind of interests are you representing ?
Jorge
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Vanda UOL <vanda@uol.com.br> wrote:
Registrars/registries negotiations with ICANN IMO can not be open. They will
be talking about their business, the problems they face, prices they pay ...
and this doesn't belongs to others to be aware. No company open their
agreements/ no business association allows other than their associates to
participate in issues will impact their particular sector of business.
Vanda
-----Original Message-----
From: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Hong Xue
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 9:25 AM
To: At-Large Worldwide
Subject: Re: [At-Large] ICANN regional meetings to remain closed
I can see Evan's concerns on transparency. Even if the meetings with
Registries/Registrars might have the reason to be close for trade
secret or other contractual issues, the other regional meetings should
absolutely be open and the community should be informed well in
advance.
Hong
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Carlton Samuels
<carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
The principle is important to test, especially in this AoC era. But I
suspect the registrars/registries may just assume that since they
literally
pay the piper, they can call the tune.
I would support this matter becoming an agenda item for the A&T Review
Team.
Carlton
============================================================================
============
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Hello everyone,
As part of yesterday's session in Nairobi, ALAC heard a presentation from
staffer Tim Cole regarding ICANN-run regional meetings held for
registrars
and registries. Contrary to previous suggestions, what I'd heard
indicated
that meeting organizers really have learned nothing from the backlash to
the
Toronto and Rome events. While there may be advance notice of the
meetings
that did not occur before, Cole was adamant that these ICANN-funded
meetings
will refuse admission to anyone except contracted parties. While we will
have access to the slides given at the meetings, proceedings of the
meetings
have not and will not be recorded.
In a subsequent conversation, Cole said I was "wasting my time" trying to
get ICANN to change this policy; while on one hand insisting that the
meetings contained absolutly no confidential discussion, he insisted that
the presence of public observers would have a "chilling effect" on
discussions.
I personally do not believe that ICANN should fund meetings that are
completely closed, especially meetings that could open its process to
those
who may be more easily able to attend the regional meetings (that are
local
to them) than full ICANN meetings. I suggested there were ways to ensure
that attendees were aware that meeting content was technical and not
policy.
Not enough.
From an At-Large perspective I personally consider this a transparency
issue, feeding public belief that ICANN is merely a trade association for
contracted parties. If registrars and/or registries want to organize,
fully
fund their own meetings and invite ICANN staff to speak, that's their
choice. But meetings planned and mostly funded by ICANN should not be
restricted this way.
Taking Cole at his word that we are wasting time trying to influence
staff,
different tactics may be in order. Perhaps this is something best dealt
with
through the still-forming AoC committee on transparency and
accountability.
Or maybe this can be taken up directly to the Board since we do have that
channel available. On the other hand, one ALAC member told me after
Cole's
presentation that pressing the issue would be burning bridges just as
ALAC
is trying to enhance its relationship with other ICANN communities, and
we
have more pressing matters.
What do others think? Is this an issue worth persuing, or a risk worth
avoiding?
- Evan
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann
.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
--
+========+++++++++++++++======
Carlton A Samuels
Strategies for Education Technologies and Curriculum Development, Process
Engineering & Improvement, ICT Policy, Internet Governance
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann
.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
--
Dr. Hong Xue
Professor of Law
Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
Beijing Normal University
www.iipl.org.cn
19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
Beijing 100875 China
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann
.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann .org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann .org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_________________________________________________________________ ¿Cuánto espacio necesitás para guardar tus emails? Con Hotmail tenés 5GB y puede ampliarse a más. http://www.descubrewindowslive.com/hotmail/almacenamiento.asp _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann .org At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org