I think this ICANN paper oversteps the mark significantly. Encouraging extra judicial, extra jurisdictional executive actions is highly destabilising as it interferes with local multi-stakeholder processes. ICANN is not in existence to replace localism with global control but to co-ordinate between local controls in regards the technical management of some of the Internet's unique resources. Yes there is a problem with DNS being a significant vector for bad actors as well as good ones. No the solution to deal with bad actors is not this. Christian On 14 Mar 2012, at 07:36, Derek Smythe wrote:
I find it ironical that somephishing emails have an anti-phish warning in to not respond to emails ... and succeeds.
Education only goes so far.
On 3/14/2012 6:28 AM, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
Educate them?
On Mar 13, 2012, at 8:08 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Consider the type of activities described at http://www.antiphishing.org/
You receive a fake email from your bank containing a link to malware on a hosted domain.
If you are the real bank, what actions can you take to protect the users that have received this email?
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org