Nov. 26, 2010
2:55 p.m.
On 26 November 2010 09:19, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>wrote:
Am I getting it wrong or should the electorate be 20? This looks like 19 - and 3 electors neglected to vote!
That's right. The only way the vote could have broken down into those percentages was Sébastien 7 Alan 5 Pierre 4 We know Alan was ineligible to vote. So that indeed means that only 16 or 19 eligible votes were counted. This is possibly the most important vote At-Large has held since its inception. The regions and/or NomComm deserve to know who did not vote. - Evan