I still have a preference for no third-party
campaigning, but perhaps that is just me.
Not just for you Alan, I concur and prefer that there are no third party campaigns. And also support the secret ballot. Having said that though, it would be ideal if the committee could avoid spending so much time and energy in San Juan in yet another round of elections so soon after changing chair and again in six months vote for another new board liaison. I believe there is need for a certain degree of stability at least for the next year or so. alice . Given the high-contested election, I do have a preference for a secret ballot to minimize bad feelings, and to ensure that people
vote for who they believe is the best candidate instead of who they may feel they have to visibly support.
Alan
At 18/06/2007 10:34 AM, Robert Guerra wrote:
Alan:
Thanks for the comments on the process and request of information
from the candidates.
My concern is that the process, in as much as possible - be as open and transparent as possible. Comments should, i think not only come
from the candidates - but from all those involved in at-large.
Key positions, should - wherever possible be subject to comment, consultation, and an open and transparent process. Not sure if nominations/decisions have been done that way in the past. If they haven't, then we should change them. we have the occasion now , so let's try..
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org