Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] GAC Scorecard Comments due by 25 March

Hi Hong, On 23 March 2011 22:14, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Evan,

Many thanks for the added part on PDPDR. It is terrific.

For substantive evaluation, I do see your point but still cannot go with GAC. No rule-making can satisfy all the parties and interests. We can only stick to our priority and focus. If at-large has to pick a side between trademark registrants and new gTLD applicants, I'd rather choose the latter if free speech and free flow of information are implicated by the trademarks.

OK. I've also noticed Olivier's endorsement of your position. I've removed the substantive evaluation component from the 'endorsed GAC position' list - Evan