It is good that ccTLDs are not strictly confined to their respective countries. In a scenario of ccTLD being rigidly registered to users / companies belonging to their respective nations, there would be greater room for filtering / discrimination. One country might simply block websites of a certain other country. It would pave the way for a network or national networks which isn't really a good thing to happen. Sivasubramanian M http://turiya.co.in http://www.isocmadras.com facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6 Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:33 PM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
i guess i worry about what is effectively a gTLD not being governed under
the same rules as the rest of the gTLDs.
Seems to me that horse left the barn a very long time ago when .to and .ws and .cc and .cx threw the doors open to all comers.
R's, John
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org