On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:45:01 -0700 (PDT), Danny Younger <dannyyounger@yahoo.com> wrote:
Patrick, you've declared your intent to be a registry operator (.sport), yet you see no conflict of interest in claiming to represent the at-large?
I think I answered this several times. This is a not-for-profit, community-based *project* I lead under in a different context than my ALAC duties. Actually, there is a lot of common ground between the ALAC values and the ones of my project. If and when I feel there would be a conflict of interest, be reassured I would resign. The difference between me and many others inside the ICANN community is that my project is public.
With regard to evidence, you are as capable of using Google as anyone. Feel free to cite the hundreds of ALS citations pointing to this historic announcement.
So, if it is not indexed by google it means no discussion is happening ? This sounds like poor evidence.
It's no wonder that the Board ignores all the ALAC statements.
Not so. The latest evidence is that the upcoming DAG V3 will probably not include a series of controversial proposals from the IRT, which ALAC opposed in its statements, both in ALAC's own and in the joint ALAC/NCUC ones. Patrick