Actually, I was not implying anything like that, I just asked some questions because I was seriously worried about the impact of this story on the general audience. ICANN's note (https://www.icann.org/news/blog/fire-on-cargo-ship-affects-it-equipment-boun...) is fully satisfactory to me. Cheers, R
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large- bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di John R. Levine Inviato: martedì 4 ottobre 2016 17:09 A: svg@milathan.ltd Cc: At-Large Worldwide Oggetto: Re: [At-Large] Cruz' revenge
It is the first time that happened since the creation of ICANN. A quick risk analysis would say: <> - That custody during transport is not for ICANN - That duplication is not necessary - There was a very quick response - ICANN is working with transparency and accountability in solving critical problems, with costs adjusted as necessary to maintain the operation.
Agreed. This is a very unusual problem, and ICANN is taking reasonable action to deal with it.
Some of the people here appear to be suggesting that ICANN should have two or three sets of the 100 tons of stuff they send to meetings, or perhaps that they should run their own shipping line. I can promise that the Register would be full of stories about "A peek inside ICANN's million dollar warehouse of cables."
Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org