Danny Younger wrote:
They will spend years building an institution that devotes 100% of its time to administrative minutia and will forever continue to postpone policy discussions because they never seem to finish their higher priority organizational work... and then the institution collapses as little by little the players realize that nothing of consequence is getting done. I've seen it happen. Twice. and this will surely be round three if we remain on the same track.
I completely agree. Let's stop arguing administrivia, and focus on policy issues. Let's drop the discussion on whether yet another organizational model could be better and make this one work. Two issues were already circulating, before deviating again on organizational matters, and were the input for policy decisions to be taken on regions, and the whois. There are sure others, we probably need just to put a little bit of order in the discussion by setting priorities. Personally, I think that it would be extremely beneficial for newcomers if we had a quick summary of the whois situation. Wendy has one, and is still doing, an excellent job in the WhoIs TF, and I hope that she could find the time to give this tutorial. Otherwise, we can rely on staff, or put together something collectively. Regards, Roberto