Hi Beau, Nowhere was it brought up during that discussion that the "aspirational
document" was now out of scope. Further, the "aspirational document" was in the stated scope of Group A in more than one update I have sent to the GNSO.
So, a) No one has the authority to simply "rule it out" and b) as co-chair of the group, I didn't agree to any such thing.
That's good to hear. Unfortunately there are no transcriptions or recordings of the meeting posted yet, but I was quite sure what I heard (and, based on a conversation afterwards, Heidi can back me up). I hope your conversations with Michele can clear up what I hope in indeed just a mis-communications.
However, what would be great would be that someone other than you, me, Cheryl or the "usual suspects" actually contribute to this process.
Indeed. There have been zero community comments on made in the "Aspirational document" workspace since Heidi set it up. If the lack of interest in a Charter is maintained, there will indeed be valid reason for the rest of the group to marginalize it. - Evan