Vittorio and all, Thank you for actually stating the crux of the central problem with ICANN. Too much process, too far removed from users, and resulting in bad superseded policy nonconsensual decisions of impracticality. When this is addressed in removing levels of process and users of whatever sort have the practical right to self determination within and from without the ICANN structure, than and only than will more reasoned practical policy be determined and effected. As the ICANN process you nicely outline in brief below, stands now governments, and special interests groups have far too much say so in determining policy decisions, many of which have clearly shown to no work or serve the user community well and were forewarned of such. Vittorio Bertola wrote:
Nick Ashton-Hart ha scritto:
I thought I would make a point here which might be helpful with respect to the timing of making statements about the draft ALAC Review report.
I would like to add that there are two different parts in this work.
The first one is the external reviewer compiling their review and making some recommendations for future developments.
The second one is the Board - first through its dedicated committee, then through the Board Governance Committee and finally through the Board itself - discussing the report with the ICANN community and understanding whether the recommendations are really sound, and whether and how they should be implemented, or whether something entirely different should be done.
I see it unlikely that the ALAC Review WG could eventually recommend something completely different from the conclusions of the review, but this is certainly not impossible.
The ALAC Review WG has organized two different events in Paris, which more or less correspond to the two parts above; the first one is aimed at supplying Westlake with final comments on their text so that they can remove the "draft" label from their report, while the second one is the beginning of the subsequent WG discussion process:
http://par.icann.org/en/23jun08/workshop/at-large-review
http://par.icann.org/en/25jun08/workshop/bgc-at-large-review
We hope to see participation in both events, but their scope is fundamentally different and I hope that appropriate comments will be made for each of the sessions.
Personally, I do not have final comments yet, but my first impression is that, even if the recommendations are reasonable, there was not much effort in exploring radical changes to ICANN's basic architecture; however, possibly that lies outside of the mandate of an external reviewer of a single structure on the ICANN map, while it's more of a discussion for the Board itself; so it might become a more prominent theme in the second phase of the process.
Ciao, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827