Dec. 6, 2007
8:01 p.m.
Why not simply have a list that is publicly archived and available for all to see. That is what the GNSO does, and it seems to work just fine. Too bad "alac@..." is already used for this list - it would have been the perfect name. To the extent that there is occasionally traffic that needs to be private or unrelated to ICANN activities (I recently posted a message asking if other ALAC members were planning to be a tourist for a few days after the Delhi meeting), we can have a separate and non-archived list that is truly used only for those sensitive or social/non-ICANN issues. Or we can skip having a new list and just use direct mail. Alan