Cheryl, As long as you are writing to Chris, please note my concern regarding the composition of the IDNCWG that has only room for two representatives from the GNSO... is it appropriate that (whatever selection is made) at least four GNSO constituencies will not have a voice in the process? regards, Danny --- Cheryl Langdon-Orr <cheryl@hovtek.com.au> wrote:
Thank you for this link Danny, I read the view contained therein with great interest, and have taken the liberty of copying this reply to the ccNSO Chair, Chris Disspain, so that this information can also be accessed by others on the IDNC... Once it is officially finalised and formed...
CLO
-----Original Message----- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Danny Younger Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2007 7:14 AM To: 'At-Large Worldwide' Subject: [At-Large] fast track process for IDN's
In response to Cheryl's note (point 5) on the proposed fast track process for IDN's:
The Internet Governance Project has today expressed some concerns about the ccTLDs' plans to award themselves a bunch of new IDN TLDs without going through any real process -- see
http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2007/12/5/3392238.html
I share the point of view expressed therein.
____________________________________________________________________________
________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ