From the NCUC list (public). Background to the note below is a CricleID article "ICA to ICANN: The IRT Must Open Up Or Be Stripped of Official Status and Support" <http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090422_ica_icann_implementation_recommendati...> Adam
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:16:37 -0400 Reply-To: Mary Wong <MWong@PIERCELAW.EDU> Sender: Non-Commercial User Constituency <NCUC-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> From: Mary Wong <MWong@PIERCELAW.EDU> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICA challenge to IRT To: NCUC-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Description: HTML
Thanks, Bill - I'd just seen that article too.
Everyone, as I was asked by the IPC to be on the IRT, and as I wasn't able during the last NCUC call to elaborate on what's being done, here's a quick summary:
- The Implementation Recommendation Team's (IRT) initial draft proposals will be released tomorrow for public comment. I'd encourage everyone to review the proposals and submit feedback, as the IRT is due to make its final recommendations to the Board in late May.
- the IRT meets weekly via teleconference, and in two in-person meetings (one in April, one in May); in between, various work teams that were formed within the IRT also meet via teleconference and work on draft proposals for circulation and comment by other IRT members.
- the discussions to date include proposals dealing with both top and second level domains and regarding both pre-launch and post-delegation issues. The primary suggestion is to use an IP Clearinghouse with tiered rights protection mechanisms (instead of a single Reserved Names List - this was a non-starter given the flak the GAC and the Geographic Names List has been getting); and there may also be a rapid suspension system for abusive registrations.
- contrary to some expectations, the process so far has not been a whitewash in favor of big brand owners. There have been compromises, disagreements and quite a bit of debate over controversial issues. While the draft report is unlikely to please everybody, I think it is more balanced than some had feared and is not, for example, a back door route to expand the UDRP (as Phil Corwin alleges in the article).
- Minutes of previous IRT meetings are available online at <https://st.icann.org/new-gtld-overarching-issues/index.cgi?trademark_protection>https://st.icann.org/new-gtld-overarching-issues/index.cgi?trademark_protection (if you have limited time, the more informative minutes are probably those from April 2 and April 17).
So please review the draft proposals when they are released late tomorrow, and please do make public comments - and also start a discussion on this listserv - if you see anything that you think may impact on non-commercial users and consumers.
Thanks, Mar
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Franklin Pierce Law Center Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: <mailto:mwong@piercelaw.edu>mwong@piercelaw.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: <http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php>http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: <http://ssrn.com/author=437584>http://ssrn.com/author=437584 y
William Drake <william.drake@GRADUATEINSTITUTE.CH> 4/23/2009 4:50 PM >>> If you've not seen it...http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090422_ica_icann_implementation_recommendati...