May 30, 2008
12:45 p.m.
Considering its size and "popularity" why aren't they courting one of the other registry operators? Is there any sane reason for them to continue a loss making exercise when a larger and leaner organisation might be in a better position to do it?
At this point, it looks liks it's pretty much Michael Egan's hobby. If financial stability or community benefit were the main considerations, he'd have unloaded it ages ago. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.