my reason? becasue i wasn't on this list back then. but you should have heard me in private. all i am saying that if we go into the category process some day in the future as more and more people are advocating, we should consider looking at the whole stable of names. i don't hold it against them that they are doing what they are doing. fair by the rules. but some people argue that there are more than two kinds of names, and if that is the case, the reshuffle should probably be a fair reshuffle that does not a-prioiri choose some names for special privilege. a. On 30 Jul 2010, at 21:00, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
Oh! So we have passed without comment on .tv, .la, .to, .nu, no doubt among a few others, then why are we piling in on .co, now?
Just a thought, CW
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org