John, Thanks for the whack. In reviewing my notes, I also spotted an interesting recommendation from Randy Glass, namely "to add, there should be a 3rd party representative, like an ombudsman within ICANN that could handle a registrant's inter-registrar problems." The notion of a registrant liaison with adjudicating powers is a good one. Perhaps this could be put forward as a recommendation. --- John L <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
I took another whack. Other than fixing lots of typos, main changes are:
- beginning clarifies that this is from the RAA WG
- added the beneficiary language bullet from Bret
- removed transfer timeout language, since it already does that
- added a few words to acknowledge things ICANN already (at least in theory) does
I didn't reinstate the WHOIS privacy stuff since I saw only one comment asking for it. But the section on resellers does say that registrars should have contracts that pass through all registrant responsibilities, which covers the most important point, I think.
Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.>
RAA-WG mailing list RAA-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/raa-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.o...
RAA WG Online:
https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?registrant_registrar_relations
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469