Un article paru dans The Economist est apparemment bien informé des évolutions à venir. En tous cas cette présentation des choses ne semble pas heurter l'ICANN qui le relaie activement sur Twitter (@icann) http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430 <http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430 &fsrc=rss> &fsrc=rss Please see the Article in The Economist. It was send to Twitter and to different lists. <http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430
http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430 I think it is an important issue for At-Large. I am wondering if the DOC will ask ICANN for more transparency when the post-JPA situation was done by the DOC in a so transparent and open manner that some usually very well inform people from the ICANN participants are asking what will happen?. All the best The coverage by Circleid: http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_jpa_coverage/ Sébastien Bachollet Président d'honneur - Isoc France <mailto:sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr> sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr <http://www.egeni.org/> www.egeni.org <http://www.isoc.fr/> www.isoc.fr