On 30/12/2021 17:46, Jeff Neuman via At-Large wrote: I have no opinion on this matter but have a few newbie questions: 1. Based on https://icannwiki.org/.hiphop - what is the issue with .hiphop? 2. Based on https://www.jjnsolutions.com/post/jeffrey-j-neuman-appointed-to-internet-lea... isn't it a conflict of interest on your part? 3. Based on https://circleid.com/posts/20211230-icannas-accountability-mechanisms-in-nam... you state "following ICANN staff inaction (for its over four-month delay) of its Assignment Request for the .hiphop Registry Agreement." - based on my experience with ICANN processes, a 4 month delay is a mere second in ICANN time. I would start complaining only after 4 years. Regards, Hank NB The opinions or lack of opinions expressed above are solely my own
All,
I thought this was important enough of an issue to be discussed and I am happy to answer any questions you may have.
Please seehttps://circleid.com/posts/20211230-icannas-accountability-mechanisms-in-nam... <https://circleid.com/posts/20211230-icannas-accountability-mechanisms-in-nam...>.
This article covers ICANN’s taking retaliatory action against a company I am involved in for daring to use the Reconsideration Process. We alleged ICANN’s inaction was a violation of the Bylaws (and you can read about that separately).
What does ICANN do? It “pauses” its consideration of what it has failed to act on in retaliation against my company thereby compounding the original issue. In other words, we complained ICANN was moving to slow in our request for the assignment of a TLD Agreement - and that was a violation of the Bylaws. ICANN has responded by stating that it now needs to halt all consideration of the assignment request because we filed the Reconsideration Action in order to investigate the basis of our claims that it was moving too slow.
———————
There will be a follow up post on why our initial request for urgent reconsideration was denied. In short, ICANN has taken the position that:
A). Only ICANN Board Action can be challenged on an Urgent Basis. ICANN staff Action or inaction may not be.
B). And ICANN Board Inaction cannot be challenged where the basis for the “Inaction” is ICANN’s failure to pass a Board Resolution. In other words, if you are angry at the Board for not passing a resolution, you cannot file an urgent reconsideration request…..why…..because in order to have an urgent Reconsideration Request, there needs to be an actual Board Resolution. Thus, if the board fails to pass a resolution, by definition, there is no resolution on which to basis the urgent action.
————-
This case also covers ICANN’s misguided fight against the blockchain. Although the request to assign .hiphop has nothing to do with the blockchain, ICANN has decided (wrongfully) that it does.
——————
If you want to cover any of this in an open session, I am more than happy to discuss. I believe all of this should be done in the open and if ICANN Org is not going to be completely open and transparent, then there is no reason we cannot be.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC Jeff@JJNSolutions.com +1.202.549.5079 Http://www.jjnsolutions.com
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.