What, that we have a non-voting representative on the Board currently or that Vint said in the meeting - yeah, that might be something good that we should do - when we brought it up yet again, of course in the context of over 90 ALS applications (at the time), as opposed to - we deserve it just because...as we have been doing in the past (and that never got even that much of a response) . -----Original Message----- From: Wendy Seltzer [mailto:wendy@seltzer.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:46 PM To: jam@jacquelinemorris.com Cc: 'At-Large Worldwide'; 'NA Discuss' Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] [At-Large] Reason for NO vote for TelecommunitiesCanada's ALS application Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
Why would you say that they are ducking the issue of At Large VOTING representation on the Board? It's been discussed at the ALAC/Board meetings several times, and in Lisbon we got quite a positive response. We do currently have representation on the Board, BTW.
Really? That's news to me. I'd better tell the voting electorate, since they won't likely be aware either. I'll consider it a positive response when we actually see a change in structure. --Wendy -- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html http://www.chillingeffects.org/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 - Release Date: 5/21/2007 2:01 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 - Release Date: 5/21/2007 2:01 PM