Siavash, Thank you for your reply. Allow me to pose the question: If there was one TLD for the arabic language, why would we need to have a host of arabic national IDN TLDs? Who gains from such a scenario other than ccTLD managers and particular governments? Is the public (user) interest best initially served by first rolling out one script per ccTLD, or by rolling out a series of language TLDs with no set territorial linkages (understanding that national IDN TLDs could be rolled out in a subsequent timeframe)? I am concerned that the current approach may see entire language groups ignored while we cater to these two above-named special interest groups. Which ccTLD manager, for example, will necessarily commit to supporting Wolof? Or which ccTLD manager will make it a priority to support the Romani language? ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/