Robert I as Chair of ALAC caused these statistics to be posted as a result of discussions at both ExCo and ALAC meetings that you unfortunately were not able to attend... This topic of list activity is on the next ExCo meeting and we will also report to the ALAC and public lists as we (ALAC) is in a point of review this topic (as you should know) however if you so desire we will brief you more fully in a 5 minute session (held just prior to the advertised start time) at the next meeting you attend... Let me know... There is NO requirement on staff to respond as they are acting under ExCo instruction... CLO -----Original Message----- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Robert Guerra Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:42 AM To: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Tracking of our messages - not a privacy violation .. ? A simple message from staff indicating that statistics were going to be posted for the use of helping us assess the level of engagement would be a good thing to have happened. Not sure why such a notice wasn't sent. regards Robert On 11-Apr-08, at 12:25 PM, John Levine wrote:
My interest is to - start a discussion on this, and from there see what consensus (if any) emerges on the issue.
Robert, this is silly. The ALAC has a lot of important issues to deal with, but this isn't one of them.
If the full text public archive of this list isn't a problem, it's absurd to claim that a few simple statistics are.
R's, John
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org