Jefsey, Let's be clear about something -- I joined neither the IDNO nor the icannatlarge.com organization because they chose to do nothing more than wrangle about process, process, process. These organizations didn't spend a single moment on policy development, policy analysis, policy review or policy implementation initiatives on behalf of either their members or those that they purported to represent. The bulk of their time was spent on who gets elected to what seat, on motions to remove or censor other members, and on continuous in-fighting until they both self-destructed. The organizations that manage to survive in the ICANN ambit are the ones that make the defense of the interests of their constituents their number one priority, like the IPC. The ALAC has not done that. When registrants pounded at ICANN's door in the wake of the RegisterFly disaster, did we see the ALAC do anything? When registrants can no longer successfully transfer their domains owing to the behaviors of rogue registrars, does the ALAC do anything? When NetSol's front-running captures the attention of both the media and the tech community, do we hear of the ALAC rising up forcefully to do something about it? No, all we hear about is the ALAC asking for more money. The ALAC after six years is now nothing more than a monolithic single point of failure that plays at process, does nothing more than suck travel dollars out of ICANN and helps to swell an already bloated budget. The ALAC never had the gumption to stand up for their own representational rights, so how do you expect them to have the tenacity or interest to fight for anyone else? All they seem to be able to do is issue milktoast "Statements" and elect suppliers instead of users to the NonCom. Even when the NonCom Review recommended that the ALAC seat two members on the ICANN board, this useless group of noncommercial orgs did absolutely nothing to push the point on behalf of their own community -- this is a body that has become less than useless. --- JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com> wrote:
Dear Danny, for nearly eight years I know you, I do not know if you have proposed the text of a motion. I wander what is really your target: you are an informed hard worker, and sometimes extremely good, on occasions really brillant. However, I am afraid that instead of helping the community and ICANN you are fighting both. I opposed you a lot when you were GA Chair because you wanted to be the GA by your own and speak by yourself on our behalf - not because your positions were wrong (just sometimes, at that time, sophomore's positions - but that time is gone). Then you were not really fighting, but not helping us either with the IDNA and ICANN-alarge.
Could we not reach a modus vivendi, where we (you and ALAC) mutually take advantage from the other, fight together for the users, rather that you fighting the ALAC. ALAC is not a democratic representative of the users, but certainly a sample of their most motivated ones. If you/we do not teach them, how do you want them to know? jfc
At 00:30 17/02/2008, Danny Younger wrote:
the ALAC, in its role as the "voice of the individual Internet users" has absolutely nothing to say on the topic...
no policy recommendations, no request for an issues report, no request for a PDP, no request to ICANN Staff for feedback as to whether NetSol practices constitute a violation of the RAA -- instead, the ALAC appears to be either totally clueless or horribly irresponsible -- but what can you really expect from a bunch of people that are just pretending to be the at-large so that they can continue to milk the ICANN cash cow? If they really were the at-large, we would have heard their outrage about these situations... instead all we hear are their ongoing requests for even more money while registrants receive no assistance whatsoever from their "Voice" within ICANN.
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ