"JFC Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com> said:
We have committed to remain fully interoperable with IETF solutions when they are clearly defined (we are not going to read 5500 RFCs, it is not our hobby). Our basis is ISO 3166, which is the very structure of the International network since 1978. It has documented the national scripts and languages since its ISO-3166-1:2006 version. We will base ourself on the Open Source LS640 Linguasphere series that served as the basis for the current ISO 639-6 standard preparation of an exhaustive listing of all the language names.
1. If you wish to be "fully interoperable with IETF solutions", may I recommend that if you're serious about your proposal, you read those "5500 RFCs". I am surprised how many people are trying to re-invent the wheel, starting from the guy at IETF that presented a protocol which basically did what AlohaNet did back in 1970 & Packet Radio henceforth. 2. I'm afraid that ISO 3166 has nothing to do with national scripts & languages. The official name is Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions. You're speaking solely of ISO 639. You're also missing ISO 15924 - Codes for Writing Systems, aka Codes for the representation of names of scripts. As for the rest of the post, I'm sorry but I can't understand it. O.