That would certainly be a plan to discuss but even if there is some limit on numbers in any "ICANN" Joint WG, as we did with the GNSO Restructuring Work where we had only one rep we would wrap an ALAC / At-Large WG to support that person (or persons) and I would expect their involvement there as well... CLO 2009/3/6 Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu>
Alan Greenberg ha scritto:
At its meeting in Mexico City, the package of Registrar Accreditation Agreement amendments was unanimously approved. This was following a GNSO meeting earlier this year where the package was rejected.
As a result of the thematic session on rights and the Internet at the At Large Summit on Tuesday, a group of people and ALSes committed to start working on a draft of the proposed registrant rights charter.
Now I guess we have to understand how this fits into this picture - maybe some of the people from the thematic session could be considered by the ALAC as names for this working group? It doesn't make sense to have an ALAC-GNSO working group plus an ALAC-ALS working group.
Ciao, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-- Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO)