As a registrant, when someone charges me more fees, that someone should be accountable and have some reason for doing such. Randy Glass A@L On 7/7/07, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@yahoo.com> wrote:
Alan Greenberg posted the following comment on 27 June:
"The ALAC requests that ICANN consider charging registrars part or all of the $0.22 fee for names deleted during the AGP."
http://forum.icann.org/lists/budget-0708/msg00001.html
Sorry to say, that I cannot find the minutes of the meeting in which this decision was agreed upon, nor can I find a recording of the San Juan meeting sessions.
How did the ALAC arrive at this particular recommendation without the benefit of any on-list discussion whatsoever? What input did the RALOs have into the endorsement of this one specific recommendation? Why were other viable options not endorsed?
Is this an authorized statement? If so, why wasn't it issued by the chair?
Some answers would be appreciated.
____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica... --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
-- ------------------------- AmericaAtLarge.org RJPacific.com DDMF.org