Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> [2016-04-26 19:31:17 +0000]:
On 26/04/2016, 20:19, "Pranesh Prakash" <pranesh@cis-india.org> wrote:
In part, yes. Please look at the comments that CIS and other submitted to this: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/dns-underserved-2014-05-14-en
Which bits specifically?
Those specific bits that make the case the ICANN policy is hindering growth of registries and registrars in "underserved" regions.
Some requirements imposed by ICANN have no relevance in a country like India or Egypt.
Then don’t use a gTLD domain name.
Does this discussion sound like a flippant joke, Michele? If so, my apologies, but I'm not laughing.
Where must arbitration under registry contracts with ICANN happen? Los Angeles County.
Unless you are a registry that has signed a contract with ICANN why does that matter?
I'm saying it matters for registries that have signed a contract with ICANN, or are considering doing so. -- Pranesh Prakash Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society http://cis-india.org | tel:+91 80 40926283 sip:pranesh@ostel.co | xmpp:pranesh@cis-india.org https://twitter.com/pranesh