March 8, 2010
7:30 a.m.
On 03/07/2010 11:24 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
Have I read you right, in that you're suggesting that having public observers would actually reduce the meetings' anti-trust liability exposure?
I don't know. But it would not surprise me if an expert in these things said that in the balance of interests that occur when measuring risks that having public participation, and in particular participation by the customers, might help alleviate the risk. Again, I'm not an expert in this stuff, and things will probably vary jurisdiction by jurisdiction (such as US, EU, etc etc.) --karl--