Dear Bill, These are brief comments. 1) a) Possible Purposes: i) To provide information and recommendations to the chartering organizations (and perhaps ultimately the broader ICANN community) in accordance with the charter or directions from the chartering organizations. ii) To provide a discussion forum to achieve greater community understanding. iii) In any event, consensus policy development must occur using current Supporting Organization (SO) and Advisory Committee (AC) rules. I note that (1)(a)(iii) recognizes SO and AC rules. However, it does not address situations where these rules may conflict and what is to be done when there is a conflict of rules. Aside from the rules, what is to be done when there is a conflict on positions. The At Large is mandated to highlight positions of end users and it would be great if this is somehow factored. Suggested draft principle could be as follows:- In recognition of At Large's role in highlighting global end users interest nothing shall take away the rights nor restrict in any way shape or form At Large's capacity to constantly engage in raising the rights and interests of end users. Whilst I note that (2)(c)(iii) covers it somewhat but it appears a trifle inadequate. Kind Regards, Sala On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:23 AM, William Drake <william.drake@uzh.ch> wrote:
Hi,
As NCUC liaison to At Large I thought I should bring the following to your attention.
Some here may recall that there was quite a bit of controversy and debate in the GNSO Council last year about the formation and operation of cross community working groups. This arose in particular with regard to the JAS process, various aspects of which stimulated a range of concerns across the three industry SGs. Without reliving all the back and forth, these included perceptions that the GNSO's role in policy development was being usurped or at least nibbled at, concerns about the channels and procedures through which JAS progress was reported out and the board responded, the extent to which the chartering organizations should operate in synch, and so on. In consequence, there has been a widespread desire among these SGs to lay down clear rules of the road to regulate how CWGs function. In Council discussions NCUC members argued for maintaining some flexibility and subsidiarity to avoid tying hands too much, and noted inter alia that if we'd followed a strictly regula! tory approach ALAC would not have been able to help move the JAS process along when the GNSO was, well, moving slower. It would be fair to say that we were pretty much alone in these views.
In October, the Council launched a drafting team to propose guiding principles for CWGs going forward that would respond to the various concerns. That team has now completed its work and a motion to approve its Principles is on the agenda of our 19 January meeting. https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+19+January+2...
People may wish to have a look at the Principles http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-principles-for-cwgs-23dec11-en.pdf, which specify that all SO/ACs involved should adopt and follow a single joint charter for CWGs, that CWGs outputs do not express community consensus per se, and so on.
If there are any views that people would like to have noted in the Council discussion and vote, please let me know asap.
Thanks,
Bill
*************************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland william.drake@uzh.ch www.mediachange.ch/people/william-j-drake www.williamdrake.org ****************************************************
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Internal mailing list ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal
ALAC Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
-- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala Tweeter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Cell: +679 998 2851