This time I agree 100% with Danny
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:33:36 -0800> From: dannyyounger@yahoo.com> To: at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> CC: na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [At-Large] Letter to the Board> > I am of the view that the ALAC needs to write a very strong letter to the Board expressing their disgust with (1) the manner in which the ICANN Public Forum session was conducted that allowed for a very limited amount of time within which to interact with the Board and (2) the almost total lack of remote participation opportunities that were available to at-large members.> > As someone that attempted to participate remotely, I can't point to a single ALAC session that allowed for meaningful remote participation, nor were audio feeds available for many workshops. > > This has to be the worst case of both in-person and remote participation management that I have ever seen at an ICANN session.> > > > > > > _______________________________________________> At-Large mailing list> At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann...> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/