Re: [At-Large] Who is At-Large, anyway?

Robert Guerra wrote:

I think it is a good idea to discuss the definition of At-Large in light of the upcoming review of ALAC. I look forward to this discussion, and hope that it can lead to the formulation of one or more definitions .

Oh joy. Another invitation to get involved in yet one more debate first principles, which will no doubt land us very close to where the last debate left us. Rinse and repeat. Let me know when we've come to a consensus of who we are. I have work to do. Does anyone here actually want to ACCOMPLISH something? - Evan