March 31, 2011
11:12 a.m.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net> wrote:
and the 2004 to date experience has shown that expansion predicated on a registry sponsor model is not workable in the context of the assumption that a domain name = trademark. The IPR issue blocks DNS name expansion. All we are seeing is the same old names in new tld's. Not a helpful situation when naming resources are needed to support billions of new users and devices in an IPv6 scale Internet.
These "naming resources" don't need to be TLDs, do they? -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel