Evan, I didn't hear anything so far, which I haven't heard before, and on top of that, it comes with the suggestion "since this is so good, it should be implemented". May be, before putting all these on the table, so to speak, you could have contacted the Meetings Committee, or ask them why they have not so far implemented so many and so good things? Perhaps there is a good reason, and perhaps it is not as easy, as it sounds, to make the changes we all have been suggesting during the last years. And I hope you will be able to understand that if something happens / does not happen the way you think it should be, there is also a very good reason behind it, and this reason obviously has priority upon your expectations. All the other thoughts are for another mailing list, not this one, where - as far as I can see - people are trying to have constructive discussions. Let's not turn this list into the "internet governance" one. veni