Roberto, Absolutely. I support and encouarage creating such a constituency but I in a wider plan as decribed in the 3-group model in the joint statement. Dominik -----Original Message----- From: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:roberto@icann.org] Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 2:09 PM To: 'Danny Younger'; Dominik Filipp Cc: 'At-Large Worldwide' Subject: RE: [At-Large] Monthly ALAC Teleconference 13 May 1330 UTC Danny Younger wrote:
If you really want to help shape DNS policy by way of articulating firm positions, then either find yourself a home in one of the GNSO constituencies, or act in concert with others to launch a new constituency (in view of the possibilities afforded in the "revised" GNSO). That's where the real work will be getting done.
Good. So you do agree on the fact that to create a Registrant Constituenct in the GNSO is a far better option than to create a Registrant Advisory Committee, that will be, in your own words, another "retarded sibling in the family that can only make suggestions to others as to the policy that should be followed"? Cheers, Roberto