Dec. 3, 2010
3:14 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:44 PM, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
Very interesting scenario. I assume the CEO made it clear that ICANN whould not only listen to one stakeholder group and ignore all others.
Actually, his blog entry sounded surprisingly like he was planning to ignore the one stakeholder that still has the power to shut ICANN down.
I got a whiff of that as well! -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel