Danny: When I met you in LA, I thought that you were the best. Now I can see my mistake. Your comments are not constructive, I'm sure your comments have been made with some intentionality. I'm thinking that may be you are an element used by others (I don't Know who) to disqualify the ALAC's work, or.... you bought the ideas of who try to delete ALAC of the map. I worry so much, the possibility that one smart guy, only be a .......... You can say this in a better way, making a critic, and maybe in some points we can find coincidences but..... It is not the first time that you say how much useless is ALAC and their members, but what are you proposals?. please tell the people what are your true intentions and how you can give solutions to this, could be clear, could be honest. thank's and sorry for my bad english. Me gustaria usted pudiera entender mi idioma, por que de esta manera estariamos en igual posicion de mantener esta discucion. Lamentablemente mi ingles no es perfecto y por lo que se Ud. solo habla su lengua, es una pena que Ud. solo piense y hable en ingles estadounidense. Me gustaria verlo a Ud hacer sus "aportes" en espanol o en otro idioma diferente al ingles, are you able?. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre abogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423www.sitioderecho.com.arwww.densi.com.ar > Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:24:32 -0700> From: dannyyounger@yahoo.com> To: wendy@seltzer.com> CC: alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [At-Large] Comments on GNSO improvements> > Wendy,> > I agree with your assessment that this Statement> completely lacks substance. It offers no specific> counter-proposals to the BGC work-product. As a> document, it is almost as useless as the ALAC itself.> > What value is there in declaring "we do believe that> the Internet end-user’s voice must be included in the> new GNSO" without formulating a means by which this> may be accomplished?> > ... and then there are the comments that make one want> to vomit, such as, "Since as mentioned the At-Large> community has been actively engaged in developing and> implementing new approaches to a working group> modality for policy development, some of the> experiences we have had in that process may prove> salutary."> > The ALAC is absolutely clueless when it comes to> running a working group, and their WGs have been> abject failures -- asking the GNSO to consider ALAC> achievements in this area is laughable and makes the> ALAC look like fools and simpletons. I'm starting to> think that whoever penned this Statement is living in> some alternate universe where reality rarely intrudes.> > > If you ever needed proof that ALAC serves "no> continuing purpose in the ICANN structure", this> Statement would go a long way toward making that case.> > The Board is looking for real solutions to deal with> issues that have been plaguing the GNSO since the days> of the DNSO. This Statement offers up no real> solutions. The best thing that one can say about this> Statement is that if it were printed on toilet paper > it might ultimately serve some useful purpose.> > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. > http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com> > _______________________________________________> ALAC mailing list> ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _________________________________________________________________ Ingresá ya a MSN Deportes y enterate de las últimas novedades del mundo deportivo. http://msn.foxsports.com/fslasc/