Re: [At-Large] For those of you attending the IGF

Danny Younger wrote:

If the US really values the multi-stakeholder policy development process, then why aren't we seeing such being played out in the .us ccTLD?

With all due respect, is this really a matter with which ICANN At-Large ought to be concerned? What interest does At-Large have on a global level -- or even a regional one -- on an issue which seems to me to be an American internal matter? Conversely, if the US tried to get involved in other ccTLDs' internal politics I would imagine a trail of outcry. - Evan