At 7:53 AM -0500 11/20/08, Ross Rader wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
then why should they also have an AC role and Board representatives?"
...and so many additional seats more than any other constituency on the nominating committee.
For what it's worth, GNSO collectively has more seats on the nominating committee, 7 to 5. Any comments on the new draft of the Noncommercial Stakeholders Group petition document? <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/20...> It suggests organizations and individuals that participate in the ALAC are eligible to become members of the NCGS, i.e. not the ALAC, but the entities that make up the ALAC. I don't see a problem. For example, some ISOC chapters are currently members of the NCUC (Mauritius and New York) and as I understand it can also be ALS and part of the ALAC (or do I need to re-read ALS criteria?) So the only proposed change is for the NCGS to allow individuals to participate directly in a constituency body of the GNSO. Adam
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org