Hi Holly, I haven't forgotten the statement which was composed. :) My email which has since been withdrawn was simply in relation to mapping. That was an excellent draft that you composed in relation to the recommendation for the thick Whois for the .com which shows that at the end of the day whilst we can advise the Board, the Board has the discretion to accept the advice or reject it. Although there is the possibility that the Board did raise the issue but after the fact....sigh Best Regards, Sala On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net>wrote:
Hi Sala
I think you have forgotten the ALAC comment on the .com agreement (in April 2012) - which was discussed on the ALAC list. See http://www.atlarge.icann.org/correspondence/correspondence-2-20apr12-en.htm If you remember, one of the strongest comments we made was on the lack of a thick Whois requirement, when the requirement is there for other registries and for new gTLD registries.
Holly
On 08/09/2012, at 9:27 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
Apologies. I have just noticed that whilst at first sight, it says .aero (11 June 2009) when I click on it, it shows all the revised versions. The same is true for all other Agreements.
My bad :(
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro < salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Carlton. I am slowly working my way into reading the material. I was on the http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/registries [got this from the WHOIS Review Final Report link] and noted that the .com Archived Agreement says 2006 and am wondering whether this is the Agreement that was extended or whether there were new conditions negotiated.
Could someone also clarify whether all the Agreements for others such as .info etc are all the most revised Agreements?
Thanks and kind regards,
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Carlton Samuels < carlton.samuels@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI. Note the specific request for advice via GAC on data protection. - Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz@icann.org> Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:26 PM Subject: [soac-discussion] FW: Update on the RAA Negotiations Since Prague To: "soac-discussion@icann.org" <soac-discussion@icann.org> Cc: Matt Serlin <matt.serlin@markmonitor.com>
Dear SO/AC Chairs,
****
Recognizing the broad interest in the ICANN community on the RAA negotiations, we wanted to provide you with a brief update on the work conducted since the Prague Meeting for you to share with your members.
****
Since Prague, the negotiation teams have reviewed the input received from the Community in order to identify possible path forwards on the complex issues that have been put on the table in these negotiations. Several meetings have taken place and are scheduled prior to Toronto, including plans to invite the GAC to provide input from data protection experts on several specific issues. There is also an agreement among the negotiation teams to begin analysis of a potential framework for a privacy/proxy accreditation program to be explored with the broader ICANN community.
****
For more information on these important negotiations, please visit the ICANN wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/RAA/Negotiations+Between+ICANN+and+Regis...
****
Sincerely,
****
Kurt Pritz (ICANN) and Matt Serlin (MarkMonitor)
****
****
****
****
****
****
** **
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji
Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851
-- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851