On July 14, 2018 at 20:01 6.internet@gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) wrote:
Your question "who defines..." reverberates questions such as "who defines what is good", and "who defines what is harmful and what is not". These are good questions, but often used to divert the very suggestion of doing good. The complexities in defining a notion shouldn't deter us from chosing an appropriate path.
A very big problem is "least common denominator". By which I mean any global organization is likely to descend into policies which, depending on the specific approval process, will yield a majority or even an absence of any objections. Purely as an example to ponder let me offer: Man jailed for 35 years in Thailand for insulting monarchy on Facebook https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/09/man-jailed-for-35-years-in-tha... -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*