One problem with associating 'domain parking' and a list like this CCT-RT list which basically amounts to some outside observer can't see any useful content is that the domain might be part of an ongoing work in progress. How long does someone get, by these guidelines, to go from the point of purchasing a domain and putting it into production to someone else's satisfaction? Another case might be what if you attempt to connect to that domain to determine the worthiness of its content and you are presented with a login/password pop-up? Is that worthy or unworthy? I've actually run into this sort of thinking with a new gtld and it discouraged what could have been a quite charitable and public spirited project, with no recourse. I'd say this CCT-RT list is just a particular narrative -- domain not obviously in use to some outside observer's satisfaction -- and can do as much if not more harm as good. I think first one would need the complement to a list like this which is precisely what are acceptable uses of domains? Without that it all seems rather arbitrary and error-prone, someone's laundry list of badness. P.S. Of course that's all 'malicious use aside' but the list notes that's not the major concern. -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*