I agree with Vittorio, it is important to activate every possible channel to make the voice of the individual users heard. RG
-----Original Message----- From: euro-als-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-als-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Vittorio Bertola Sent: 08 February 2007 12:01 To: Neil Schwartzman Cc: alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org; na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [EURO-ALS] [ALAC] Whois policies
Neil Schwartzman ha scritto:
I should make note that we, like our American counterparts, did make submissions regarding WHOIS policy.
You can read all about them here: http://cauce.ca/node/20
While we are at it, I would mention that the GAC is developing its own position on Whois, with the aim of approving it at the next ICANN meeting in Lisbon. I'd assume that they're working on it right in these weeks, and given that any clear stance by the GAC pro or against privacy measures in Whois databases might make a difference, I'd suggest that the ALSes who are interested in the matter try to contact their national GAC representative (and/or the national privacy authority, if existing) and ask them what's going on, and whether they could provide an opinion, and try to ensure that their country stays on the right side of the debate in the GAC.
I think that this could really help in supporting the pro-privacy positions that we have been trying to push through for years now at ICANN. -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-l ists.icann.org
_______________________________________________ EURO-ALS mailing list EURO-ALS@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-als_atlar ge-lists.icann.org