http://www.knujon.com/news.html#08052008 This was passed on to me by a friend at Berkman affiliated with the StopBadware.org project (http://www.stopbadware.org) From the text: "This is an example of a practice we have seen all too frequently where Internet companies will remove sites temporarily for reported policy violations only to restore them shortly afterwards. In some cases the domains move from one Registrar to another (occasionally two Registrars with the same parent company, however), but this is a situation where the domains went right back where they were before. DIRECT INFO/PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY was rated the 9th Worst Registrar in terms of sponsoring spam sites previously." What provisions in the revised RAA address this sort of issue from a consumer perspective? Or is this considered "outside ICANN's scope"? **************************************************************************** ******** SCANNED **************************************************************************** ********