Jan. 12, 2011
10:11 p.m.
Karl wrote:
I like your word "pseudonymous" as it better expresses the state I want to obtain - which is anonymous to a degree, but penetrable under the right conditions and in accord with the right procedures.
Can this be a starting principle on which we can agree, although I see that we have wide differences in appreciating on what the "right procedures" might be? R.