Re: [At-Large] Unsubscribe me please
Hi Garth That isn’t sarcastic - it’s sad. I am not talking about a big grand plan. I am talking about a discussion on the lists - what are they, who uses them, is there a better way. It could be a simple as eliminating one of the lists, or better labelling the lists, or simply putting a better subject heading. Please let’s not step away from what may be small reforms because we have decided it is all too hard, and ICANN will can it. Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 7:58 am, Gbruen <gbruen@knujon.com> wrote:
Holly,
This is going to sound sarcastic but it is simply factual. Me, Seun, and everyone else could collaborate and come up with a great plan and as soon as we try to move forward it will be taken over by some icann division and either get shelved, bloated, or made ineffective. This has already happened several time before with too many at-large projects.
-Garth
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid On Feb 19, 2017 2:34 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote: Folks
A great discussion on this list - making some really important points. So instead of letting the matter drop (as is so often the case), make this an item for discussion at CPH - and allow plenty of time. How do we communicate, can we do better and how.
So maybe review what some of us know - what are the lists, how are they used (or not), when people unsubscribe, do we try to find out why, is there a better way to communicate - by topic? And Dev, Garth, Seun and everyone - could there be a page or so - to that list and staff, saying this is a better way and this is how to do it.
We are starting the Review comments - and how we communicate (and how we could do it better) is clearly something that should be one of the top items on that agenda. So let’s actually make our communications structures better rather than just complain
Thanks everyone
Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 4:57 am, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com> wrote:
Oh good, then we can agree. R
Da: gbruen@knujon.com [mailto:gbruen@knujon.com] Inviato: domenica 19 febbraio 2017 18:55 A: Roberto Gaetano Cc:
Agree Holly People are more and more focusing on instant messages but discuss several points become difficult using just Whattsapp like communications. There are some unnecessary emails we could avoid but as per example votes- we can do better using appropriate tools but do no means we shall ignore the relevance of discussion lists Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone Sorry for typos On 19 Feb 2017, at 18:04, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net<mailto:h.raiche@internode.on.net>> wrote: Hi Garth That isn’t sarcastic - it’s sad. I am not talking about a big grand plan. I am talking about a discussion on the lists - what are they, who uses them, is there a better way. It could be a simple as eliminating one of the lists, or better labelling the lists, or simply putting a better subject heading. Please let’s not step away from what may be small reforms because we have decided it is all too hard, and ICANN will can it. Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 7:58 am, Gbruen <gbruen@knujon.com<mailto:gbruen@knujon.com>> wrote: Holly, This is going to sound sarcastic but it is simply factual. Me, Seun, and everyone else could collaborate and come up with a great plan and as soon as we try to move forward it will be taken over by some icann division and either get shelved, bloated, or made ineffective. This has already happened several time before with too many at-large projects. -Garth Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid On Feb 19, 2017 2:34 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net<mailto:h.raiche@internode.on.net>> wrote: Folks A great discussion on this list - making some really important points. So instead of letting the matter drop (as is so often the case), make this an item for discussion at CPH - and allow plenty of time. How do we communicate, can we do better and how. So maybe review what some of us know - what are the lists, how are they used (or not), when people unsubscribe, do we try to find out why, is there a better way to communicate - by topic? And Dev, Garth, Seun and everyone - could there be a page or so - to that list and staff, saying this is a better way and this is how to do it. We are starting the Review comments - and how we communicate (and how we could do it better) is clearly something that should be one of the top items on that agenda. So let’s actually make our communications structures better rather than just complain Thanks everyone Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 4:57 am, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com<mailto:roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com>> wrote: Oh good, then we can agree. R Da: gbruen@knujon.com<mailto:gbruen@knujon.com> [mailto:gbruen@knujon.com] Inviato: domenica 19 febbraio 2017 18:55 A: Roberto Gaetano Cc: <mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Lets me contribute by proving some SOLUTION to this longdebate of Mail issue. Certainly e-mails are just too old age technology tocommunicate within a large community. and to top of it when you allow everyoneto send message to everyone it becomes too messy as it it right now since lasttwo days. Messenger application is a better choice. However the mostpopular messaging platform whatsapp doesn’t offer any business solution.whatsapp group is certainly not what we can opt for reason being its group sizeof only 256 members and privacy issues that may arise from exposing mobilenumber of all members to everyone. There are few well know messaging platform like JioChat andwechat which let business and organisation create official channel. it letchannel owner send message to each one follower and if a follower replies itsvisible only to channel owner. the channel owner can choose to distribute thisresponse agin to all the followers. Best part is user's personal details like mobile number ande-mail is never exposed to anyone and these services comes with no cost. Regardsrahul From: Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> To: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> Cc: "at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Monday, 20 February 2017 4:18 AM Subject: Re: [At-Large] Unsubscribe me please Agree Holly People are more and more focusing on instant messages but discuss several points become difficult using just Whattsapp like communications. There are some unnecessary emails we could avoid but as per example votes- we can do better using appropriate tools but do no means we shall ignore the relevance of discussion lists Vanda ScarteziniSent from my iPhoneSorry for typos On 19 Feb 2017, at 18:04, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote: Hi Garth That isn’t sarcastic - it’s sad. I am not talking about a big grand plan. I am talking about a discussion on the lists - what are they, who uses them, is there a better way. It could be a simple as eliminating one of the lists, or better labelling the lists, or simply putting a better subject heading. Please let’s not step away from what may be small reforms because we have decided it is all too hard, and ICANN will can it. Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 7:58 am, Gbruen <gbruen@knujon.com> wrote: Holly, This is going to sound sarcastic but it is simply factual. Me, Seun, and everyone else could collaborate and come up with a great plan and as soon as we try to move forward it will be taken over by some icann division and either get shelved, bloated, or made ineffective. This has already happened several time before with too many at-large projects. -Garth Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DroidOn Feb 19, 2017 2:34 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote: Folks A great discussion on this list - making some really important points. So instead of letting the matter drop (as is so often the case), make this an item for discussion at CPH - and allow plenty of time. How do we communicate, can we do better and how. So maybe review what some of us know - what are the lists, how are they used (or not), when people unsubscribe, do we try to find out why, is there a better way to communicate - by topic? And Dev, Garth, Seun and everyone - could there be a page or so - to that list and staff, saying this is a better way and this is how to do it. We are starting the Review comments - and how we communicate (and how we could do it better) is clearly something that should be one of the top items on that agenda. So let’s actually make our communications structures better rather than just complain Thanks everyone Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 4:57 am, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com> wrote: Oh good, then we can agree.R Da: gbruen@knujon.com [mailto:gbruen@knujon.com] Inviato: domenica 19 febbraio 2017 18:55 A: Roberto Gaetano Cc: _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
The At-Large Technology Taskforce are looking at group chat applications https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Group+Chat - there a signup link to a group chat server we are currently testing now. Dev Anand On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Rahul Srivastava via At-Large < at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
Lets me contribute by proving some SOLUTION to this long debate of Mail issue.
Certainly e-mails are just too old age technology to communicate within a large community. and to top of it when you allow everyone to send message to everyone it becomes too messy as it it right now since last two days.
Messenger application is a better choice. However the most popular messaging platform whatsapp doesn’t offer any business solution. whatsapp group is certainly not what we can opt for reason being its group size of only 256 members and privacy issues that may arise from exposing mobile number of all members to everyone.
There are few well know messaging platform like JioChat and wechat which let business and organisation create official channel. it let channel owner send message to each one follower and if a follower replies its visible only to channel owner. the channel owner can choose to distribute this response agin to all the followers.
Best part is user's personal details like mobile number and e-mail is never exposed to anyone and these services comes with no cost.
Regards rahul
------------------------------ *From:* Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> *To:* Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> *Cc:* "at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
*Sent:* Monday, 20 February 2017 4:18 AM *Subject:* Re: [At-Large] Unsubscribe me please
Agree Holly People are more and more focusing on instant messages but discuss several points become difficult using just Whattsapp like communications. There are some unnecessary emails we could avoid but as per example votes- we can do better using appropriate tools but do no means we shall ignore the relevance of discussion lists
Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone Sorry for typos
On 19 Feb 2017, at 18:04, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote:
Hi Garth
That isn’t sarcastic - it’s sad. I am not talking about a big grand plan. I am talking about a discussion on the lists - what are they, who uses them, is there a better way. It could be a simple as eliminating one of the lists, or better labelling the lists, or simply putting a better subject heading. Please let’s not step away from what may be small reforms because we have decided it is all too hard, and ICANN will can it.
Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 7:58 am, Gbruen <gbruen@knujon.com> wrote:
Holly,
This is going to sound sarcastic but it is simply factual. Me, Seun, and everyone else could collaborate and come up with a great plan and as soon as we try to move forward it will be taken over by some icann division and either get shelved, bloated, or made ineffective. This has already happened several time before with too many at-large projects.
-Garth
*Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid* On Feb 19, 2017 2:34 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote:
Folks
A great discussion on this list - making some really important points. So instead of letting the matter drop (as is so often the case), make this an item for discussion at CPH - and allow plenty of time. How do we communicate, can we do better and how.
So maybe review what some of us know - what are the lists, how are they used (or not), when people unsubscribe, do we try to find out why, is there a better way to communicate - by topic? And Dev, Garth, Seun and everyone - could there be a page or so - to that list and staff, saying this is a better way and this is how to do it.
We are starting the Review comments - and how we communicate (and how we could do it better) is clearly something that should be one of the top items on that agenda. So let’s actually make our communications structures better rather than just complain
Thanks everyone
Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 4:57 am, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com> wrote:
Oh good, then we can agree. R
*Da:* gbruen@knujon.com [mailto:gbruen@knujon.com <gbruen@knujon.com>] *Inviato:* domenica 19 febbraio 2017 18:55 *A:* Roberto Gaetano *Cc:* <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
We moved the company to Slack about two years ago. Since then we’ve become less reliant on email, but we still use it. A lot of companies in the tech space are now using Slack (or alternatives) to replace a lot of their email for internal discussions etc., One of the upsides to Slack is that it integrates very neatly with a load of 3rd party services. Downside – you can’t “browse” archives, though if you are on a paid plan you can search them. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
Mail is a formal communication, *chat is informal. *What kind of communication do we want to have, one with traceability or one that responds to instantaneous and individual occurrences without tracking capability? Erik Huesca Knowledge and Digital Culture Foundation Erik S. Huesca *F*undación para el *C*onocimiento y *C*ultura *D*igital (FUNCO) www.funco.mx erik@huesca.mx erik@funco.mx Móvil: + 55 26619243 On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Rahul Srivastava via At-Large < at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
Lets me contribute by proving some SOLUTION to this long debate of Mail issue.
Certainly e-mails are just too old age technology to communicate within a large community. and to top of it when you allow everyone to send message to everyone it becomes too messy as it it right now since last two days.
Messenger application is a better choice. However the most popular messaging platform whatsapp doesn’t offer any business solution. whatsapp group is certainly not what we can opt for reason being its group size of only 256 members and privacy issues that may arise from exposing mobile number of all members to everyone.
There are few well know messaging platform like JioChat and wechat which let business and organisation create official channel. it let channel owner send message to each one follower and if a follower replies its visible only to channel owner. the channel owner can choose to distribute this response agin to all the followers.
Best part is user's personal details like mobile number and e-mail is never exposed to anyone and these services comes with no cost.
Regards rahul
------------------------------ *From:* Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> *To:* Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> *Cc:* "at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
*Sent:* Monday, 20 February 2017 4:18 AM *Subject:* Re: [At-Large] Unsubscribe me please
Agree Holly People are more and more focusing on instant messages but discuss several points become difficult using just Whattsapp like communications. There are some unnecessary emails we could avoid but as per example votes- we can do better using appropriate tools but do no means we shall ignore the relevance of discussion lists
Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone Sorry for typos
On 19 Feb 2017, at 18:04, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote:
Hi Garth
That isn’t sarcastic - it’s sad. I am not talking about a big grand plan. I am talking about a discussion on the lists - what are they, who uses them, is there a better way. It could be a simple as eliminating one of the lists, or better labelling the lists, or simply putting a better subject heading. Please let’s not step away from what may be small reforms because we have decided it is all too hard, and ICANN will can it.
Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 7:58 am, Gbruen <gbruen@knujon.com> wrote:
Holly,
This is going to sound sarcastic but it is simply factual. Me, Seun, and everyone else could collaborate and come up with a great plan and as soon as we try to move forward it will be taken over by some icann division and either get shelved, bloated, or made ineffective. This has already happened several time before with too many at-large projects.
-Garth
*Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid* On Feb 19, 2017 2:34 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote:
Folks
A great discussion on this list - making some really important points. So instead of letting the matter drop (as is so often the case), make this an item for discussion at CPH - and allow plenty of time. How do we communicate, can we do better and how.
So maybe review what some of us know - what are the lists, how are they used (or not), when people unsubscribe, do we try to find out why, is there a better way to communicate - by topic? And Dev, Garth, Seun and everyone - could there be a page or so - to that list and staff, saying this is a better way and this is how to do it.
We are starting the Review comments - and how we communicate (and how we could do it better) is clearly something that should be one of the top items on that agenda. So let’s actually make our communications structures better rather than just complain
Thanks everyone
Holly On 20 Feb 2017, at 4:57 am, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com> wrote:
Oh good, then we can agree. R
*Da:* gbruen@knujon.com [mailto:gbruen@knujon.com <gbruen@knujon.com>] *Inviato:* domenica 19 febbraio 2017 18:55 *A:* Roberto Gaetano *Cc:* <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
The flurry of un-subscription requests is attributable to two things happening in close proximity: 1. We have just recently finished compiling and verifying our lists of ALS primary and secondary representatives. All of those who were not already subscribed were added to the ALAC-Announce, and their respective RALO list as well as the At-Large list. They received "Welcome" messages, but perhaps did not understand why. I believe that unaffiliated members of the RALOs that have them were also subsribed. 2. A message about Board candidate questions and answers was sent out to the At-Large, ALAC-Announce and all RALO lists resulting ins some people receiving three copies. In retrospect, perhaps we should not have been quite that enthusiastic in which lists it was sent to. According to the ALAC E-mail Guide (http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-E-MailGuide-Sept2013), ALS Representative must be subscribed to the ALAC-Announce list and their RALO list. At-Large is optional. All Welcome messages include an unsubscribe link. Due to the requirement mentioned above, ALS representative should not be able to unsubscribe from the ALAC-Announce list and their RALO list without staff approval, but as it happens, that option is not currently set correctly and if any of these people had tried to unsubscribe, it would have worked. In light of the present discussion, the ALAC will be reviewing the mailing lists and their uses in the near future. Alan Greenberg Chair, ALAC
Hi all, I must highly agree with what Allen just said. As being one of those people and even saying bluntly that I was out of it, I was plunked back in. Suddenly there are votes happening and I'm being deluged with stuff that I felt *completely* unqualified to participate in. I almost baled on the first day. I'm still unsure why I'm here. Yes, the welcome message was also sent to unaffiliated members as I apparently am now. Hope that helps at all, D On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
The flurry of un-subscription requests is attributable to two things happening in close proximity:
1. We have just recently finished compiling and verifying our lists of ALS primary and secondary representatives. All of those who were not already subscribed were added to the ALAC-Announce, and their respective RALO list as well as the At-Large list. They received "Welcome" messages, but perhaps did not understand why. I believe that unaffiliated members of the RALOs that have them were also subsribed.
2. A message about Board candidate questions and answers was sent out to the At-Large, ALAC-Announce and all RALO lists resulting ins some people receiving three copies. In retrospect, perhaps we should not have been quite that enthusiastic in which lists it was sent to.
According to the ALAC E-mail Guide ( *http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-E-MailGuide-Sept2013* <http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-E-MailGuide-Sept2013>), ALS Representative must be subscribed to the ALAC-Announce list and their RALO list. At-Large is optional.
All Welcome messages include an unsubscribe link. Due to the requirement mentioned above, ALS representative should not be able to unsubscribe from the ALAC-Announce list and their RALO list without staff approval, but as it happens, that option is not currently set correctly and if any of these people had tried to unsubscribe, it would have worked.
In light of the present discussion, the ALAC will be reviewing the mailing lists and their uses in the near future.
Alan Greenberg Chair, ALAC
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Unsubscribe me please *Zdenko Seligo*Abogado Av. Venezuela, Torre Asociación Bancaria de Venezuela, Piso 4, Ofic. No. 42, Urb. El Rosal, Caracas 1060. República Bolivariana de Venezuela. Telfs. Ofic.: + 58 212 954.02.08 / 954.09.58 Fax: + 58 212 952.39.26 Telfs. Celulares: + 58 / 412.220.22.02 / 414.032.60.10 Sitio web: www.zdenkoseligo.com <http://www.zdenkoseligo.com> Blog: www.zdenkoseligo.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/ZdenkoSeligo *Advertencia Constitucional y Legal*: Los artículos 1 y 4 del Decreto con Fuerza de Ley sobre Mensajes de Datos y Firmas Electrónicas, otorgan y reconocen eficacia y valor jurídico a este e-mail, el cual se encuentra protegido por el artículo 60 de la Constitución, el artículo 22 de la Ley Especial Contra los Delitos Informáticos y por el secreto profesional abogado-cliente, según lo establecido en los artículos 25 y 26 del Código de Ética Profesional del Abogado Venezolano y el artículo 61 de la Ley de Abogados. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Darlene Thompson <thompson.darlene@gmail.com> Date: 2017-02-20 17:19 GMT+00:00 Subject: Re: [At-Large] Mailing list subscriptions To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Cc: At-Large <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Hi all, I must highly agree with what Allen just said. As being one of those people and even saying bluntly that I was out of it, I was plunked back in. Suddenly there are votes happening and I'm being deluged with stuff that I felt *completely* unqualified to participate in. I almost baled on the first day. I'm still unsure why I'm here. Yes, the welcome message was also sent to unaffiliated members as I apparently am now. Hope that helps at all, D On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
The flurry of un-subscription requests is attributable to two things happening in close proximity:
1. We have just recently finished compiling and verifying our lists of ALS primary and secondary representatives. All of those who were not already subscribed were added to the ALAC-Announce, and their respective RALO list as well as the At-Large list. They received "Welcome" messages, but perhaps did not understand why. I believe that unaffiliated members of the RALOs that have them were also subsribed.
2. A message about Board candidate questions and answers was sent out to the At-Large, ALAC-Announce and all RALO lists resulting ins some people receiving three copies. In retrospect, perhaps we should not have been quite that enthusiastic in which lists it was sent to.
According to the ALAC E-mail Guide ( *http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-E-MailGuide-Sept2013* <http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-E-MailGuide-Sept2013>), ALS Representative must be subscribed to the ALAC-Announce list and their RALO list. At-Large is optional.
All Welcome messages include an unsubscribe link. Due to the requirement mentioned above, ALS representative should not be able to unsubscribe from the ALAC-Announce list and their RALO list without staff approval, but as it happens, that option is not currently set correctly and if any of these people had tried to unsubscribe, it would have worked.
In light of the present discussion, the ALAC will be reviewing the mailing lists and their uses in the near future.
Alan Greenberg Chair, ALAC
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Please anyone does not know how to visit https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large and unsubscribe himself just send an email to at-large-request@atlarge-lists.icann.org with the subject: subscribe lets quit sending emails to the mailing list which have hundreds if not thousands of interested people and annoy them to read meaningless emails asking everyone to unsubscribe them from this list. My apologies if my email sounds harsh but your request to main list asking to unsubscribe is more rude than us guiding you how to unsubscribe (although we're not part of At-Large staff nor ICANN) Kindly consider the time you're wasting of these people reading such useless emails. Thank you for understanding and my apologies again if my email sounded hard.
On February 21, 2017 at 14:53 bashar@kuwaitnet.com (Bashar Al-Abdulhadi) wrote:
Please anyone does not know how to visit https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/ mailman/listinfo/at-large and unsubscribe himself just send an email to at-large-request@atlarge-lists.icann.org with the subject: subscribe
lets quit sending emails to the mailing list which have hundreds if not thousands of interested people and annoy them to read meaningless emails asking everyone to unsubscribe them from this list.
As the old, old joke goes: And if you do send an unsubscribe to the entire list you will be removed! -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
participants (11)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Bashar Al-Abdulhadi -
bzs＠theworld.com -
Darlene Thompson -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh -
Erik Huesca -
Holly Raiche -
Michele Neylon - Blacknight -
Rahul Srivastava -
Vanda Scartezini -
Zdenko Seligo