+1 on Steve's friendly amendment on Olivier proposal... demi On 09/19/2013 08:34 PM, Steve Crocker wrote:
I'm ok with the intent of this. I'd rather not cast the choices as "accepting or refusing.". There are plenty of situations where the result will be more nuanced. Let me suggest "explaining what action it took and the rationale for doing so.". Anything similar, particularly if it's written more smoothly, is ok with me.
Thanks,
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org <mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear Review Team Members,
Please find enclosed Olivier's proposed language:
/The Advice of ICANN advisory committees shall be duly taken into account. The ICANN Board will respond to advice from all advisory committees explaining its rationale for accepting or refusing their advice./
This relates to item 12. Enclosed you will find a link to Avri's template: https://community.icann.org/display/ATRT2/Issue+12+Template * * Thanks,
Best regards
Alice *----* *Alice Jansen* *Strategic Initiatives Manager* *ICANN* /Rond Point Schuman 6, Bt.1/ /B-1040 Brussels, //Belgium/ Office: +32 289 474 03 Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 Skype: alice_jansen_icann Email: alice.jansen@icann.org <mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org> _______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org <mailto:atrt2@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2