All, I went back and reviewed the work schedule of the ATRT1 during 2010. The ATRT1 kicked off its work with an initial conference call on April 12, 2010. In total, the ATRT1 held 16 conference calls and 5 face-to-face meetings. For the face-to-face meetings, the ATRT1 held 2 meetings in conjunction with ICANN meetings. It also held 3 "stand alone" meetings in Marina Del Rey in May, Beijing at the end of August and in Boston in October to meet with its retained Independent Expert, The Berkman Center. As for the conference calls, it held 2 conference calls prior to its first face-to-face meeting in Marina Del Rey, 2 conference calls prior to its second face-to-face meeting in Brussels at the June ICANN meeting, 5 conference calls prior to its third face-to-face meeting in Beijing at the end of August, 4 conference calls prior to its fourth face-to-face meeting in Boston in October, 2 conference calls prior to its fifth face-to-face meeting in Cartagena at the ICANN meeting in December. To be clear, I do not believe that the ATRT2 must follow the same schedule. However, this provides a useful reference for the frequency of interactions and the rhythm of the work required to produce the first set of recommendations. I also attach the preliminary report of ATRT1 from its first face-to-face meeting in Marina Del Rey in May 2010. At that meeting, ATRT1 addressed the following items: - Conflict of Interest Policy and Statements - Election of Chair and Vice Chair - Interviews with ICANN staff including the CEO - Methodology and Timetable for ATRT work - Discussion of Conceptual Framework and Possible Performance Indicators - Adoption of a work calendar and deliverables While the terms of reference for ATRT2 will be slightly different from ATRT1, the organizational tasks will be likely similar. If I recall, there were assignments coming out of the second ATRT1 conference call for certain members to draft a proposed methodology for the work and other prep work to set the stage for the Marina Del Rey meeting. We should discuss how we want to prepare for the meeting coming up in mid-March to be efficient in moving the work of ATRT2 forward. Regards, Brian On 2/26/13 7:59 AM, "Fiona Asonga" <fasonga@kixp.or.ke> wrote:
Hallo Steve,
I would definitely prefer if all are treated the same; regardless of how they joined the team, moving forward.
regards
Fiona
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Crocker" <steve@shinkuro.com> To: "ATRT2" <atrt2@icann.org> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:16:01 PM Subject: [atrt2] Egalitarian listing of ATRT2 members?
During the organization call Friday I was using a print out of the members. It had separate sections for the Volunteer Review Team members, the Independent Experts and the Ex-Officios. My preference is for all of the team members to be considered uniformly part of the same team, leaving behind the history of how we were selected. However, if the team prefers to retain the distinctions, it's certainly workable.
This is a small point, but since I found myself reacting internally and, to some extent, tripping over it while I chaired the call, I thought I'd mention it.
Preferences?
Thanks,
Steve
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2