Note that there are 9 new recommendations in the Exec Summary numbered 10 to 18. The first is on the PDP, and for some reason it was classed as based on the ATRT1 in earlier versions, which is likely the cause of the confusion. I note that the footnote for 10.3 in the Exec Summary was updated as Brian mentioned in an earlier note, but the footnote that appears in the body of the text for the same Rec is different and presumably should match that in the Exec Summary. I had also earlier suggested that in the body of the text (but not the Exec Summ), that this be a paragrapg following the Rec instead of a footnote, to ensure that it is not missed. Brian, I must say that I am amazed at how much work has been done to get the report to this stage. I am sure it was not easy. Thank you! Alan At 13/10/2013 10:42 PM, Brian Cute wrote:

Larisa, Charla and Alice,

Attached is the Draft Report with some edits and corrections. Please note that I changed the numbering of the paragraphs in the body of the Report and in the Table of Contents for the Assessment of ATRT1 Recommendation Implementation subject matter only. I did not renumber the paragraphs pertaining to "new" Recommendations from ATRT2. There are 8 "new" Recommendations (numbered 11-18 in the Executive Summary). It was not clear to me how the enumerated 8 corresponded to the text in the Report from a numbering perspective. I am sorry but if you can help finish that task (and at this point I trust your judgment on the numbering of the document over mine). Please call me if you have any questions. I have a meeting with the PIR Board tomorrow but should be free after 5:30p.m. EDT.

Best, Brian

_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2