Dear all, Following on from Stephanes mail below regarding our call today, pursuant to Steve request, please find the IAG-CCT PDF version of the draft report on choice, competition and consumer trust on the community wiki page: <https://community.icann.org/display/IAG/Draft+IAG-CCT+report> https://community.icann.org/display/IAG/Draft+IAG-CCT+report. The final report will be delivered in time for the Los Angeles ICANN meeting, so this is the communitys opportunity to provide your thoughts on the draft. It should be noted that this work is intended to inform the New TLD Review Working Group when it takes up their review of new gTLDs one year after they have been added to the A root. Kind regards, RA Ron Andruff ONR Consulting, Inc. <http://www.ICANNSherpa.com> www.ICANNSherpa.com From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Stephane Van Gelder Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2014 12:24 To: bc-gnso@icann.org Subject: [bc-gnso] Fwd: [gnso-review-dt] MP3 recording GNSO Review Working Party teleconference Thursday 07 August 2014 1400 UTC Colleagues, FYI, for those of you who want to listen to the call that Ron talked about in the update he gave during our own constituency call today. Best, Stéphane Van Gelder Milathan LTD "Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice" ---------------- Discover The Milathan Post on http://post.milathan.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org <mailto:nathalie.peregrine@icann.org> > Date: 7 August 2014 17:33 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] MP3 recording GNSO Review Working Party teleconference Thursday 07 August 2014 1400 UTC To: "gnso-review-dt@icann.org <mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org> " <gnso-review-dt@icann.org <mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org> > Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> " <gnso-secs@icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> > Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Review Working Party teleconference held on Thursday 07 August 2014 at 1400 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-20140807-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#julty The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Klaus Stoll Jennifer Wolfe Philip Sheppard Ron Andruff Chuck Gomes Stephane Van Gelder Avri Doria Rafik Dammak Guest speaker: Colin Jackson, Richard Westlake Apologies: none ICANN Staff: Larisa Gurnick Mary Wong Lars Hoffman Matt Ashtiani Glen de St Gery Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Adobe Chat transcript: Matt Ashtiani:Welcome all to the GNSO Review Working Party Meeting on 7 August 2014! Philip:waiting on phone Ron A:Greetings all! Jennifer Wolfe:Hello to everyone! Philip:on phone line now hello everyone Chuck Gomes (RySG):Hi Nathalie Peregrine:Avri Doria has joined the AC room Matt Ashtiani:survey monkey link - https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GNSOREVIEW360SURVEY Matt Ashtiani:Date: Tuesday, 12 August 2014 Time: 19:00-19:30 UTC (time converter: http://goo.gl/kJvuIm) Matt Ashtiani:Date: Wednesday, 13 August 2014 Time: 14:00-14:30 UTC (time converter: http://goo.gl/UNDIsl) Matt Ashtiani:Additionaly webinar information - https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-05-en Nathalie Peregrine:David Maher has joined the AC room Chuck Gomes (RySG):I assumed the 50 to 100 number was per major category not for total responses. Chuck Gomes (RySG):I am okay with waiting until after the webinars but I wouldn't wait much longer. Chuck Gomes (RySG):Poor participation in the webinars would provide a good indicator of the problem of August. Chuck Gomes (RySG):I think it would be good to do the webinars again in early September. rafik:@chuck I didnt see announcement circulated yet about the survey Jennifer Wolfe:Sorry - my phone line dropped - calling back in. Chuck Gomes (RySG):What about changing the deadline to September 23. Then we could add a week if needed and still end by September 30. Ron A:@Chuck: support Sept 23 Jennifer Wolfe:Back on line. Larisa Gurnick:@rafik - staff circulated the announcement to this group yesterday via email and you can see the posted announcement here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-08-05-en Chuck Gomes (RySG):Please read the WG question that was included. Ron A:@ Jen: two in the queue since you dropped Ron A:As Chuck has requested: What is the Working Group question that has been included? Larisa Gurnick:@Avri - who would be the ideal audience for WG survey? Colin Jackson:Perhaps any WG survery could be targetted at WG members Ron A:All members of the GNSO are potential WG members. Avri Doria:Larisa, all who have been in a WG, and that is aa broad audience that goes beyond gnso Avri Doria:Colin, exactly, past and present. it is a big filed that goes beyond those who are SG/C members. Larisa Gurnick:Thank you, Avri Ron A:Thank you for that. checking back on their affiliation is excellent. Avri Doria:What about people who are members of one group and observers of another. Larisa Gurnick:There is a text box in the actual survey - this is a pdf version Philip:Ignorance has never been a barrier to opinion within ICANN Philip:; ) Ron A:My concern is that bad actors might see this as an opportunity to cast dispersions on another group. May be wrong, but have been a long time in ICANN... Ron A:@ Philip: Well said! ;o) stephane van gelder:understood Richard, thx. stephane van gelder:that clarification helps a lot Ron A:What does question #4 mean? Philip:@ron Q4 may help the BRG respond, and another time a BRG member Chuck Gomes (RySG):@ Ron: If you were authorized to respond for the BC, you would list the BC. Ron A:Thanks Larisa. That helps me, but I hope respondents will get it. Ron A:It appears that Chuck and Philip did, so I'll step back on this. Ron A:One take away from thsi meeting for me is that we need to get a couple of WG questions into the survey... Philip:A helpful call - many thanks everyone Mary Wong:Not sure if this helps, as it doesn't reach the full pool you're hoping for, but existing WG Guidelines do require a WG Self Assessement survey after a WG competes its work.